UPDATE: The Chief fled town to Akron Ohio, and the department killed an unarmed man
Probably should have taken that flight back to Texas, son.
He don't look so happy?
Yup.
Today Bellevue City Manager Brad Miyake announced that Police Chief Steve Mylett will be reinstated effective immediately. The decision comes after a nearly three-month Bothell Police investigation, which concluded that there was no evidence to support allegations reported to the city back in August.
“After reviewing the Bothell’s Police Department’s investigation, I have concluded that there is no evidence to support the allegations made against Chief Mylett and I am reinstating him effective immediately,” Miyake said. “This was a difficult situation for everyone involved. We take allegations of any type of misconduct very seriously and we are grateful the Bothell Police investigated this matter thoroughly."
This is the Chief who told the Mayor, City Manager, and City Attorney, that I was a crazy lying criminal ... but that he wouldn't charge me with anything as a favor, and that no one should talk to me...
Hey Chief, what time is that flight back to Texas??
Hey Chief, what time is that flight back to Texas??
|
|
|
|
Chief Mylett lied and then told everyone that I was so upset and crazy, that no one in the police department should speak to me.
Turns out, he was a liar the whole time.
The City Manager and City Attorney apparently think this will not come back to haunt them, as they are unelected and have cushy jobs that outlast even the Mayor.
In fact, I think THEY think they are in charge of our City, not the taxpayer!
https://q13fox.com/2018/08/03/bellevue-police-chief-steve-mylett-placed-on-leave-amid-criminal-investigation/
https://www.king5.com/article/news/local/bellevue/bellevue-police-chief-placed-on-administrative-leave-amid-investigation/281-580153663
http://mynorthwest.com/1067325/bellevue-police-steve-mylett-investigation/
https://www.usnews.com/news/best-states/washington/articles/2018-08-03/bellevue-police-chief-on-paid-leave-due-to-allegations?src=usn_tw
Anyone want to listen to now?
|
|
|
------ ABOUT THE CHIEF
Formerly of Southlake, Texas - The most Affluent Suburb in the USA according to FORBES.com 2008
Currently chief of police in Southlake, Texas, Mylett was one of four finalists tapped by the Police Executive Research Firm in the city's second-round search for a new chief, following Linda Pillo's retirement last April. Miyake passed up on four candidates for the position in November, after hiring the Mercer Group to conduct the first search for $21,000; a fifth candidate declined an offer to continue the hiring process.
Mylett served 23 years with the Corpus Christi Police before joining the Southlake PD as chief in 2011. Mylett also spent six years as a security police officer for the Air Force. He will join the Bellevue Police in April, pending completion of further background checks and an on-site visit and interview with Miyake and interim Police Chief Jim Montgomery planned for later this week.
While most second-round candidates showed up for interviews, panels and a meet-and-greets Thursday and Friday, Mylett said Thursday he arrived in Bellevue earlier in the week to familiarize himself with the city.
The city highlights a 30-percent decline in property crimes in Southlake, Texas, since Mylett joined the force there; property crime has become a growing concern in Bellevue.
Mylett will also be charged with leading the police department under a city diversity initiative that calls for the city's workforce to better reflect the population it serves. The Bellevue Police Department is more than 80 percent white men.
According to 2010 U.S. Census data, Southlake is more than 88 percent white and about 6.2 percent Asian with a population of 28,234, while Bellevue - at a population of 133,992 - is 59 percent white and nearly 28 percent Asian. Forbes.com named Southlake the most affluent neighborhood in the United States in 2008, the median household income at $172,951, compared to $90,333 in Bellevue."
""I believe that the officers are the best recruiters in the field," said Stephen Mylett, chief of police in Southlake, Texas. He said the BPD's lack of diversity doesn't seem intentional, just the city catching up with the growth it's experiencing. Mylett is also a finalist for police chief in McKinney, Texas, which used the Mercer Group to find its five candidates.
Mylett spoke openly Thursday about a discrimination lawsuit he filed a decade ago while on the Corpus Christi police force, alleging racial discrimination by the former police chief there because of negative testimony Mylett gave about him during another officer's civil rights trial. Mylett said Thursday he filed the lawsuit due to a systemic issue within the Corpus Christi department and to protect his integrity as it had come under question. The U.S. Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's opinion that Mylett failed to make a case for discrimination or retaliation." http://www.bellevuereporter.com/news/294425301.html
|
|
|
--- TWO MONTHS AFTER DC JOLIFFE DISMISSES MY COMPLAINT IN JULY AND SAYS THEY WONT SPEAK TO ME AGAIN, CITY ATTORNEY RIORDAN MAKES CHIEF MYLETT RESPOND TO MY SUBSTANTIAL AND UNDERSTANDABLE FRUSTRATIONS:
From: SMylett@bellevuewa.gov
To: CD
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 11:35 AM
Subject: Response
Mr. D,
My name is Steve Mylett and I am the Chief of Police for the City of Bellevue. I have been working with City Attorney Lori Riordan, and others, to address your complaints against the Bellevue Police Department and your deep dissatisfaction with several of its members. From this point forward, I would like to serve as your point of contact for the matters you raised in your e-mail messages. In order to fully discuss your concerns, I would like to invite you, your brother and your mother to City Hall to meet with me and members of my staff. My hope is that by sitting down together we will be able to clearly and openly communicate with one another in order to identify a solution for these issues.
I look forward to your response.
Chief Mylett
----- Original Message -----
From: CD
To: SMylett@bellevuewa.gov
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 6:20 PM
Subject: Re: Response - D, C
Chief Mylett,
I can think of nothing more appropriate. After we meet, you will understand my complete disbelief over what has happened here.
If only Captain Hershey had taken the time to investigate rather than jump to conclusions and dismiss my complaint, we would not be here; If Officer Peacey had investigated prudently, reasonably, cautiously, and impartially, we would not be here; If the assailant had not gotten out of his car and attacked me, then lied, we would not be here.
We most definitely wouldn't be meeting over anything I've done, because I committed no crimes, I have no criminal record, and I am deeply investetd in keeping things that way.
As an aside, I think at the very least the department should be motivated to equip body cameras. Seattle PD and the LAPD were able to implement body camera programs.
In regard to scheduling a meeting: My mother is only able to guarantee FRIDAYs open, Z is off work TUESDAY/WEDNESDAYS.
The matter is also urgent on my end, and with that in mind I will accomodate any meeting time that falls outside my classroom time (Mondays 1:30pm-3:00pm, Wednesdays 1:30-3:00pm).
I will require either my brother or mother to be with me.
It may be possible to meet with some combination of my brother, mother, and I.as early as this week wednesday morning or afternoon, or Friday.Next week is also acceptable if that works better, or even a Sat/Sunday.I check my e-mail regularly so this is a good way to reach me.
Thank you for your response.
Sincerely,
CD
----- Original Message -----
From: SMylett@bellevuewa.gov
To: CD
Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 7:07 AM
Subject: RE: Response - D, C
Mr. D,
I will be reaching back out to you sometime today or tomorrow to schedule a time that works for the both of us. As of right now I am leaning towards Friday, but I need to make sure members of my staff will be available. What is the best time for you and your mother to meet on Friday? I have to be in Seattle by 11:30 am and will return to Bellevue sometime after 2 pm.
Chief Mylett
----- Original Message -----
From: CD
To: SMylett@bellevuewa.gov
Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 12:53 PM
Subject: Re: Response - D, C
Thank you for your help. Friday afternoon would work for all of us. Anytime after you are available on the Eastside again.
My mother would like me to express her wish that none of the accused personnel be present.
I don't recommend the deputy chief be present, as I wish to discuss his written response, but, if he insists, I will not protest his right to face any criticisms directly -- I simply do not prefer any environment that may have a chilling effect on free speech.
I would also ask that no service weapons be visible if they are brought to the meeting. Our family does not own firearms of any kind.
If your department's legal advisor or anyone from the city attorney's office wishes to attend they are welcome, as are any other members of the command staff or city government.
Thank you for spending this time to meet with us.
Sincerely,
CD
----- Original Message -----
From: SMylett@bellevuewa.gov
To: CD
Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 12:58 PM
Subject: RE: Response - D, C
Mr. D,
I can accommodate most of your requests with the exception of our firearms. It is department policy that, while on duty, an officer will be armed, especially if they are in uniform. I’m certain you can understand the reasoning behind these policies. There should only be two officers in the room, one of which will be me.
I am looking at my calendar and if 3 pm will work for you and your mom I will reserve the time.
Chief Mylett
----- Original Message -----
From: CD
To: SMylett@bellevuewa.gov
Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 1:18 PM
Subject: Re: Response - D, C
Chief Mylett,
That is acceptable.
I was only requesting weapons be carried concealed out of respect of the spirit of the meeting, not that officer's be disarmed while on duty. I will bring my camera to film public officials in the discharge of their public duties, and you may of course display a weapon as part of your uniform during our meeting if you wish.
My brother usually works until 6pm on Friday, so if we can meet closer to the end of the day, for example 4pm, it makes it easier for him. I understand if that doesn't work; he has said he will be available because this is important to me, so there is still flexibility.
That's all the input I have on meeting times.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Chris Dorsett
----- Original Message -----
From: SMylett@bellevuewa.gov
To: CD
Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2015 4:27 PM
Subject: Meeting
Mr. D,
Unfortunately 4 pm will not work for several members of my team who will be attending, so if we can meet at 3 pm on Friday that will ensure I am able to have employees present who can respond to your questions and concerns.
There is another issue that I need to address with you prior to Friday.
While I certainly respect your right to record conversations with a police officer performing an official duty in public situations, not all attendees that will be present during our meeting will be police officers.
My intent with meeting with you and your family was to have a private conversation with all of you to discuss your concerns, so we can begin to work towards a solution.
I have made the effort to accommodate your requests that are within my ability to accommodate; I am asking that you meet my efforts half-way as my understanding of the spirit of this meeting was to facilitate a clear and open dialogue where both sides have the ability to freely discuss the matter.
Additionally, I cannot ignore that you have threatened the City with litigation and now inform me of your desire to record our conversation; unfortunately, I now have to question my ability to openly respond to your concerns without first checking with my legal counsel before responding.
Not that you would engage in such behavior, but I have witnessed many manipulations of tapes posted on the internet or by the media that twists the message due to editing.
I intend to have the City Attorney and my legal advisor present at the meeting to help facilitate the discussion and to provide you with first hand expert legal opinions.
I must tell you both do not consent to the conversation being audio recorded.
I would certainly encourage you to take notes, but it appears taping the meeting will be a barrier to having this conversation.
Chief Mylett
----- Original Message -----
From: CD
To: <SMylett@bellevuewa.gov>; <LRiordan@bellevuewa.gov>; <risk@bellevuewa.gov>; <council@bellevuewa.gov>; <CBalducci@bellevuewa.gov>; <jane.hague@kingcounty.gov>
Cc: <JJolliffe@bellevuewa.gov>; <mdjohnson@bellevuewa.gov>; <parpin@bellevuewa.gov>; <jlitzau@bellevuewa.gov>; <pspak@bellevuewa.gov>; <styler@bellevuewa.gov>; <dan.satterberg@kingcounty.gov>; <lastdays@thestranger.com>; <press@thestranger.com>; <editor@thestranger.com>; <editor@bellevuereporter.com>; <jdeleon@seattletimes.com>; <lkamb@seattletimes.com>; <smiletich@seattletimes.com>; <lthompson@seattletimes.com>; <newstips@kirotv.com>; <tips@komo4news.com>; <problemsolvers@komo4news.com>; <tips@q13fox.com>; <Seattle.fbi@ic.fbi.gov>; <Press@usdoj.gov>
Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2015 6:04 PM
Subject: Re: 9/23/2015 Meeting to discuss misconduct - Unacceptable terms.
> September 23 2015
>
>
> To whom it may concern, and Chief Mylett,
>
> You keep your gun. I'll keep my camera. That was the deal.
>
> You seem to want me to feel like this is my fault and you are just doing what you can in the face of my obstructive efforts, so I apologize for making you feel uncomfortable by asserting my rights. I'm not sure why I should apologize but I hope it makes you feel better.
>
> I mean, I have never edited my video evidence to manipulate context. There is no reason to suspect I would do so. What else do you suspect I may do that you feel the need to protect yourself from?
>
> The presence of third parties negates any reasonable expectation of privacy. That's the prevailing legal doctrine. I don't need their consent. You need mine.
>
> I insist on recording any meeting because of the dishonesty and willingness to manipulate narrative records, not by yourself, but by officers and command staff in the City of Bellevue police department.
>
> This is not a general suspicion, it is a substantiated and specific assertion drawn from the facts.
>
I don't feel comfortable outside my house without a camera recording at all times -- directly due to the behavior of YOUR department.
If you are telling me that your general fears are so substantiated as to apply specifically to my potential conduct, to the extent that I cannot even exercise my First Amendment right BECAUSE I wish to have a hearing of my grievances...... then I don't know what you think you are doing as a public official. That is not the law of this land, and I owe no one any courtesy at this point.
>
> You disrespect the sincerity of my claims and want all respect for your concerns. Why do you get more rights than me?
>
> If you are worried about me abusing my free speech, then rest assured in our country, the United States of America, and in our State, Washington, all citizens answer for that abuse - even police officers and public officials.
>
> I will not meet with a group of people who can say I said something I didn't say, when that has been the nearly my entire issue in the first place!
>
> My interest in protecting my liberty and life far outweigh the non-existent privacy interests of public officials, in the presence of third parties, in discharge of their duties.
>
> You say you want everyone to be free to speak? Well, now I feel that you are
> going to try and be deceptive like your officers.
>
> Now, I will never meet with you. That is your loss, as you would have had a chance to understand where to fix your department before a lawsuit.
>
> Instead, I can now only meet with the City Attorney, in private, with my family and our legal counsel.
>
> I'm sorry you were not able to meet with me -- I had high hopes for your assistance and our meeting. I was even hoping that maybe you could convince me not to sue.
>
> This backtracking is shameful and only lends to my argument that the Bellevue police don't care about following the law, but rather manipulate it out of the public eye.
>
> I have no need to pander for justice from adversarial parties who have broken their oath to uphold the law.
>
> Regards,
> CD
----- Original Message -----
From: SMylett@bellevuewa.gov
To: CD
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 4:13 PM
Subject: FW: Draft Message
Well that is truly unfortunate.
Let me go on record with you Mr. D, at this point,
no one from the City of Bellevue is accusing you of anything. You state
correctly, you have committed no crimes and you have no criminal record. I would point out the following to
you:
1. There was no arrest
made and no charges filed against you in this incident. Therefore, this incident
would not come up on a conviction/non-conviction history check as it was never
charged.
2. An officer's
determination of probable cause does not equal a charge and definitely does not
equal a fact. A fact is not found until it is found by a jury. Until there
is a finding by a jury, it is just considered evidence.
3. Evidence can be
presented from all sides and varying points of view, but the jury determines
what those facts are from the evidence presented based on weight of the
evidence, credibility, and the law. Every jury instruction in this State makes
it clear that the filing of a charge is not evidence that the charge is true.
Until a fact finder makes an ultimate finding, you are considered innocent. The
Officers' referral that day was just that, a referral.
4. Each case presented for
prosecution is reviewed based on the evidence available, merit, and the
likelihood of prevailing at trial while weighing all available affirmative
defenses. Prosecutors decide which cases will move forward to trial based on a
set criteria. In this particular case, the attorneys who reviewed your video
footage and other evidence declined to prosecute any involved parties. That
determination was made independent of the Bellevue Police Department. I realize
you struggle with this decision; unfortunately, I do not know how to assist you
with coming to terms with the prosecutor’s declination to bring this case to
trial.
I understand that you feel that the officers' conclusions
were false. I cannot change your perception just as I cannot change the
perception of all the witnesses on the day of the incident as those thoughts and
beliefs rest within each individual person.
The parties present at the scene
that day have different interpretations of what happened, just as people who
watch the video footage of the event draw different conclusions.
One's
observations or perceptions do not automatically make another's null and void.
In the end, we base our decisions on the totality of the circumstances and what
we can prove or can’t prove.
Mr. D you have accused the Bellevue Police
Department of many things based on your perception (e.g. not reviewing the
evidence, not viewing the video, not having your written statement); does
contradictory evidence automatically make you a liar because of your perception?
No it does not.
In your emails and on your website you use many terms such as
"seems", "impression", "my belief", and "the appearance."
I cannot change your
belief, I cannot change your impressions, I can only provide you with knowledge
from my position of how the criminal justice system works and inform you of our
processes and policies.
In fact you have done the same thing by providing us
with all of your materials to tell your story and share your knowledge.
I was
hoping to share the police department’s view with you in person so we could come to a better
understanding of each other's position. I, too, am disappointed that we will not
be able to meet to discuss this issue.
The incident involving your neighbors has been
investigated, as were the complaints you made against the Bellevue police
officers.
I understand you strongly disagree with the findings, but they will
stand because no one has presented any information that would cause these
determinations to be changed.
We have reviewed all of the materials in your
claim for damages; all of your complaints within your emails and social media
posts; and all materials on your website chronicling your complaint.
I have
reviewed your materials from various positions and it is unfortunate that this
incident has upset you to the extent it has and that you appear to be unable to
move on.
Mr. D, the Bellevue Police Department is not your
enemy.
I realize you think differently, but I am not sure how I can help you
overcome your dissatisfaction short of agreeing with your positions.
We protect and serve all members of the public
without bias or prejudice.
If the traffic and noise issues you have reported
continue, we will use our resources to address your concerns to the best of our
abilities.
Due to the fact that I am unable to resolve your
complaints, this message will serve as my final response to you regarding this
matter.
The City of Bellevue has closed this case and, since you have indicated
that you have retained an attorney, in the future, we will communicate with you
through your legal representative.
I wish you the best in your future endeavors.
Sincerely,
Chief Mylett
----- Original Message -----
From: CD
To: bellevuepd@bellevuewa.gov ; SMylett@bellevuewa.gov ; CBalducci@bellevuewa.gov ; risk@bellevuewa.gov ; council@bellevuewa.gov ; dan.satterberg@kingcounty.gov ; jane.hague@kingcounty.gov
Cc: lastdays@thestranger.com ; press@thestranger.com ; editor@thestranger.com ; editor@bellevuereporter.com ; jdeleon@seattletimes.com ; lkamb@seattletimes.com ; smiletich@seattletimes.com ; lthompson@seattletimes.com ; newstips@kirotv.com ; tips@komo4news.com ; problemsolvers@komo4news.com ; tips@q13fox.com ; Seattle.fbi@ic.fbi.gov ; Press@usdoj.gov
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 4:32 PM
Subject: GODDAMN HILLBILLY PIECE OF TRASH Re: Draft Message
Might wanna run that draft by someone next time you cock sucker.
Fuck you
I pointed out in the transcripts and reports where your officers make up things that didn't happen.
KC deputies got fired for less.
you again, are ignoring the EVIDENCE.
Kiss my mother fucking ass you podunk piece of shit. You can't even fucking READ????
http://bellevue-wa-police-misconduct.blogspot.com CAN YOU FUCKING READ???? THE JURY IS GOING TO LOVE THIS SHIT YOU TELL ME!!!!! I"M FUCKING SHAKING SO BAD!!!!! YOU ASSHOLE!!!! HUNDREDS OF HOURS OF ANALYSIS AND YOU SAY ITS OPINION?????????? WHAT THE FUCK!!!!! I HAVE A DEGREE IN BIOLOGY I KNOW HOW TO FUCKING READ AND WRITE
FORGET ABOUT ME. READ THE EVIDENCE.
WHAT EVERYONE ELSE BUT ME SAYS IS NOT TRUE. IT IS FALSE.
NEVER DOES HE TELL ME TO STOP FILMING.
NEVER DOES HIS BROTHER TRY TO STOP THE ATTACK.
NEVER WAS I A THREAT.
NEVER WAS THEIR USE OF FORCE LAWFUL.
THE STATEMENTS MAILED IN DAYS AFTER THE INCIDENT DONT MATCH THE STATEMENTS AT THE SCENE!!!!!! WHAT ABOUT THAT IS MY OPINOIN??? ARE YOU FUCKING STUPID!!!!! IS THIS REALLY THE CHIEF???? #$(@&*)%
NEVER
NEVER
THIS IS NOT AN OPINION THESE ARE FACTS STOP SAYING IM MAKING THIS UP!!!! STOP IT!!!! YOU ARE A LIAR!!!!!!!
We gotta fire your stupid ass ASAP and send you back to Texas where they like this shit.
THis is incredible. You really are a piece of trash.
YOU WANNA FUCKING MAKE ME MAD YOU PIECE OF SHIT YOU'VE FUCKING DONE IT.
The social media you hate? Now its time for the petitions to get your ass recalled to texas... watch what happens when you make an informed citizen mad.
Fuck you ENEMY OF THE PEOPLE OATHBREAKING LIAR
CD
PATRIOT
Awsome! Tell it like it is, bro! We live in a police state thanks to these under educated hillbilly thugs who can't find honorable employment.
ReplyDelete